Fact verification
Review a claim without hiding the method.
Pair a concise answer with its completed assessment, checked date, methodology version, and inspectable citations.
Start a cited workspaceA verification record that communicates uncertainty and gives reviewers a clear route to challenge or correct the result.
A reviewable workflow
Keep each decision legible.
-
01
Frame the claim
Separate a testable statement from commentary so the evidence can address one question clearly.
-
02
Inspect the evidence
Review the public citation, publisher, dates, and source context before treating an assessment as useful.
-
03
Read the assessment
Use the completed public score, status, checked date, and versioned method—never a hidden legacy confidence value.
-
04
Challenge the record
Submit counter-evidence or a correction request for human review instead of silently rewriting history.
The boundary matters
Public evidence can be useful without exposing the private workspace behind it.
Inspect the verification methodology- Completed verification summaries are the only public score source.
- Methodology pages explain the current formula and its limits.
- Corrections and challenges remain attached to the public review path.
Start with one source